The SimulationSeminarsReferences





News


We played for eight half-year periods. At the start we had to define the airline's strategy decide how the management team would work interpret the data presented from the last period make some medium-term and long-term fleet decisions decide frequencies fares marketing policies and so on for the next period and enter our decisions into the computer. We were given six hours.

The disks from the three teams were then collected the computer performed the simulation for Period 1 and the disks were returned.

We could then print out our results review them and make our decisions for Period 2. The decision making time was reduced steadily. At the end of the game we had just 90 minutes to make all our decisions for Period 8. While our team did not return the worst financial performance over eight gruelling periods our performance was certainly as any airline chief executive might say at a press conference announcing his losses for the year ,below acceptable standards'.

 

We started well increasing our net profit in the first period by 25 per cent to EURO 30 million ($42.3 million). After that things went downhill badly. Our profits fell for two periods. Then we sunk into the red and stayed there for four consecutive periods. It was only in the last period when the economy was recovering and we had got to grips with the marketing that we returned to profit. Over the four years we lost EURO102 million on revenues of EURO3.2 billion. Our share price started at EURO 100 rose to EURO 156 fell as low as EURO 29 and then recovered to EURO 83.
Our balance sheet was decimated.

The game posed most of the management challenges present in real life

1 Information overload.
We had masses of data but it was not presented very effectively and there were significant gaps in information. Market research reports could be purchased but they were not always reliable. The trick was to establish systems to make sure you made the best of the data available.

 

2 Shortage of resources.
With only five people and very limited time there was immense pressure to make decisions quickly.

3 Communication.
Our mini-airline demonstrated very effectively that every decision you take in one area affects something else. Most of the key decisions had to be taken collectively yet the number crunching was best done singly or in pairs. Getting this balance right was crucial.

4 Competitive pressure.
You had to be innovative in the marketplace and second-guess your competitors especially on pricing.

5 Financial pressure.
The combination of losing money on the operation and borrowing money to finance new aircraft was nearly lethal as cash flowed out of the company and the balance sheet position deteriorated rapidly.
Once the downward spiral had started it was very difficult and time-consuming to climb out.

 

 

 

Next Page

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


News
Contact
Sitemap
Homepage
Lufthansa Consulting